From all the furniture needs, the chair could be of most importance. While most of the other pieces (except the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports the human form. The term chair is meant to be looked upon here in the common sense, from stool to throne to developed types such as a bench or sofa, which can be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not overtly defined.
The social history of the chair is as intriguing as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not just a physical support and/or aesthetic creation; it historically was a signifier of social place. At the Medieval royal courts there were social signifiers between having a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but without arms, and having to cope with a stool. In the past century, the director’s and manager’s chair has developed an indicator of superior standing, and even in democratic governments the speaker sits on an elevated platform.
In its furniture form, the chair can be used for a range of different purposes. There are chairs designed to match man’s age and physical condition (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to connotate his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). Since historical days there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs to die in (the electric chair). There are chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Contemporary lifestyle has designated particular chairs in automobiles and aircraft. Each of these chair kinds has been changed to suit to growing human uses. From its particular relationship with man, the chair appears to its full meaning only when being used. Though it doesn’t make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers whether there is anything inside or not, a chair is really seen and fairly judged by a person sitting in it, because chair and sitter suit each other. Thus the individual limbs of a chair were given labels corresponding to the parts of our human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the principal work of the chair is to support the body, its worth is judged basically from how well it does measure up to this practical job. Within the build of the chair, the chair maker is bound in particular static laws and principal measurements. Within these boundaries, however, the chair maker has large freedom.
The history of the chair lasts over an era of several thousand years. There are cultures that have created significant chair shapes, as expressions of the premier endeavour in the spheres of skill and aesthetics. Within these civilisations, individual mention needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the upshot of careful scheme, are now found from tomb findings. One of them is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair would have had four legs structured not unlike those of a particular animal, a curved seat, with a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. From this design a strong triangular structure was created. There was from our knowledge no noteworthy variation in the construction of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical populace. The main change was in the complex ornamentation, in the choice of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was developed to be an easily portable seat for army officers. As a camp stool the form persevered for much later periods of time. But the stool then also was made for the use of a ceremonial seat, its original task as a folding stool neglected or forgotten. This can now be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the construction of folding stools but aren’t able to be folded because the seats are formed out of wood. The easy build of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric fastened between them, came up but some time later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best recognised of these is the folding stool, made of ashwood, which can now be found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The iconic Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not in any ancient item still around but in a trove of pictorial evidence. The archetype is the klismos seen on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location in outer Athens (c. 410 BC). It is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of those are visible. These unusual legs were most likely created in bent wood and were likely to have been had to bear a large amount of pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints holding the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore super solid and were clearly denoted.
The Romans adopted the Greek style; designs of models of seated Romans display designs of a more heavyset and are a somewhat crudely designed klismos. Both kinds, the light or heavy, were seen again as part of the Classicist epoch. The klismos chair can be found in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in some brands of considerable individuality in Denmark and Sweden from 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China can not be charted as long as the history of chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken series of drawings and artworks has been kept, detailing the inside and exterior of Chinese buildings and the kinds of furniture. Also kept of the 16th century are a collection of chairs of wood or lacquered wood, that bear an astonishing familiarity to pictures of ancient chairs.
As was the case in Egypt, there were two fundamental chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair can be found both with and without arms though never missing a square seat and straight stiles (upright side supports) to hold up the back. In one type, however, the stiles had been lightly curved by the arms to suit the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of the chairback). Together, all three parts were mortised in the yoke-like top rail. While the design of the back splat exercised a foundation for English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden pieces that just to a particular extent support corner joints (and furthermore were loose to top that off) indicate an element signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which finishes upon the rounded staves. All members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—references maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is unpleasant to sit in and may have a plaited bottom. These chairs required the sitter to remain stiff and upright; for if too much pressure is placed on the back, the chair has a way of toppling over. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this period armchairs probably were kept only for senior persons in the family, for they were esteemed greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have travelled to China from the West. It is not dissimilar much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a dissimilarity in that the top rail is prettily fixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is generally provided with metal mounts. From a Western viewpoint the ultimate effect of these two furniture designs is stylized. The structure and decoration parts are combined in a style that is at the same time naïve and refined. The patched up appearance is an outcome of the manner that the individual members do not look to have been affixed by means of either glue or screws, but were mortised with one another and held in its place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also put its mark on the chair. Works of art project a design of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to bring out a pattern of little pads. The front board and a similar board in the back could be folded after loosening some tiny iron hooks. Thus the chair was a portable piece of furniture while traveling which, at the same time, granted the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered kind of chair is seen in engravings of interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Although this kind of chair may also be made in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not determined that the form actually started in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slim dimensions; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in considerable amounts, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of these chairs lined up along a wall. The design asserts itself with its harmonious proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that was, as developed in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and was imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The model owes such popularity to a combination of leisure and elegance. The seat adheres to the human body and allows a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are achieved between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are strongly constructed on craftsmanlike methods despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof use wood of fairly thick measurements; but all members are deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been cut away, and more expensive chairs may be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative carvings. The wood could be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry can be used for all the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is occasionally used rather than upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more varied in design than the French. The French manner for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the most distinguished circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and became the preference in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became well-known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on reception desks in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content
Recent Comments